Thomas Wingfold. Chapters 64 - 80



We have one more session and we will have completed this novel.  We’ll take a short break and then turn to another work.  If you have any suggestions as to what you would like us to read next, please let me know.  My email address is rolland.hein@wheaton.edu.  Possibilities that come quickly to mind are:  GMD’s novel Paul Faber: Surgeon, which is a fine sequel to our novel; any of the works of Lewis, or any of the works of Charles Williams, or whatever.  I would enjoy hearing f rom you.

Early in our reading for this session, Wingfold visits Helen and they have a tense interchange.  Nevertheless, when Wingfold has left and Helen is alone, “she began to know in heart that the curate was right.”  Just as it is listening to his conscience that has brought peace to Leopold, so our hope for Helen’s peace of heart lies in her listening to her conscience and obeying it.

As Wingfold leaves, he is so filled with righteous anger he “could no longer reflect heavenly things.”   But, we are told in a profound and moving passage in the chapter entitled “A Review,” as he is seated on a stone and contemplates his natural surroundings, “earth and air had grown full of hints and sparkles and vital motions, as if between them and his soul and abiding community of fundamental existence had manifested itself,” and he feels as though Christ is speaking to him through nature. 

IS MACDONALD BEING UNREALISTICALLY ROMANTIC IN THIS PASSAGE, OR IS IT A CONVINCING PORTRAYAL OF THE MANNER IN WHICH GOD MAY SPEAK TO US THROUGH NATURE?  HAVE YOU HAD ANY SIMILAR EXPERIENCE?

When Wingfold brings a powerful sermon on the need for repentance and the beauty of its effects, people as usual react according to their various sets of mind.

Meanwhile, Bascombe, instead of attending church, visited the local magistrate, represented Leopold to him as one possessed of brain fever with an obsession to confess a murder, and asked the magistrate if he would go along with the farce, receive Leopold’s confession, and urge him to return home.  This they did, and Leopold, having confessed to the magistrate, is much relieved. 

After a period during which Wingfold does not see him, Leopold sets out for the parsonage, falls ill in the graveyard, and is discovered by Helen and Wingfold as they searched for him.  Dr. Faber is summoned, and after ministering to Leopold, he and Wingfold fall into an extended conversation as to whether God exists. 

Faber insists that a good God could not possibly allow the cruel suffering of innocent people, such as he encounters in his practice. Wingfold’s response, which is at the heart of GMD’s apologetic for the truth of Christianity, is as fine an answer to this type of objection as is possible to come by, and Faber, silent for a moment, replies: “Your theory has but one fault: it is too good to be true.” GMD posed this same objection elsewhere in his writings, and was fond of responding:  “It’s so good it has to be true.”

ARE YOU IMPRESSED WITH THIS APOLOGETIC?  WHAT MAKES IT ESPECIALLY CONVINCING?

One of the interests of his novel, and a great deal of its true value, is the careful way in which the inner struggles of quite different characters are so carefully and honestly presented.  GMD is determined to delineate faithfully the inner questioning that often characterizes earnest Christians as they progress in their separate spiritual odysseys.

Thus we have a detailed account of  Wingfold’s  inner questioning. In his honesty he asks himself whether he is not representing himself from the pulpit as more certain of what he was preaching than in fact he was.  But, enthralled with the glory of the Christian vision, he expresses his determination to Polwarth: “Even if there be no hereafter, I would live my time believing in a grand thing that ought to be true if it is not . . . . . I would rather die for evermore believing as Jesus believed, than live for evermore believing as those that deny him.” And Helen’s inner turmoil is also carefully given as she struggles with her love of her brother on the one hand and the  prickings of her conscience on the other: Was she in truth acting as a Satan to him?  Our attention is next focused on the draper, who is plagued by the issue of whether or not we will live forever, and Polwarth responds that it is not of first importance whether we do or not; if a person is in possession of true life, he will not even pose the issue.  Then Polwarth shares with him the tale of the wandering Jew.

The tale was written by his mad brother, who saw himself in the form of the Wandering Jew.   The jew was a servant in the house of Caiaphas, and as he saw Christ toiling under the weight of his cross on his way to Calvary, he jeered at him. Later he approaches Christ on the cross and feels his piercing eyes fixed upon him.  Ever afterwards he is haunted by that look.  In the agony of his wanderings he longs for death, which does not come.  Finally, he meets a little girl who pledges herself to help and serve him.  But the specter of Death haunts him, and his relief soon turns to agony and despair at the thought of losing her.  At the end of the tale she is engulfed with fire and becomes but a cinder.  Nevertheless, he then rejoices that the image in his heart cannot be destroyed, and the tale ends with the Jew hoping that at last he will yet be forgiven by the Crucified One.

MacDonald is fond of inserting such tales in his novels; few. however, are as long as this.  It does not strike me as being one of his better ones, but there may be a relevance that I’m not seeing.

What are your thoughts?  We’d like you to share them.
 

Comments

Unknown said…
Bill writes: It seems to me that the Wandering Jew's story reflects two of MacDonald's strong beliefs. The first is in universal salvation. His idea is that all of humanity will ultimately be saved, even the worst of criminals. Hell is still reserved for them, but it is a hell that is remedial, somewhat as we might think of purgatory. Clearly the Wandering Jew's crime of disdaining the suffering Christ, is worthy of a severe penalty. He suffers in his hell for over a thousand years. Yet near the end of Polwarth's reading he is emerging from the burning lava of a volcano full of "a mighty hope" of salvation. MacDonald, like Dante, sees our life's journey as a "divine comedy." But MacDonald goes even further. If he had written that great poem, one could imagine not only Dante and Virgil emerging from hell but everyone else as well, all on their way up the mountain of Purgatory and through salvation to Paradise! He refused to believe in the eternal damnation he was taught in his Calvinist upbringing.
A second of his beliefs seems to be that love for someone else, including romantic love, is redemptive and related to the love of God. Having the capacity to love someone furthers one's love of God.The emergence of Ahasuerus from the lake of fire follows his having plunged into the molten lava to save his maiden love. His distress at losing her is followed immediately by a certainty that her image will remain with him eternally. That in turn leads to the "mighty hope" of salvation, and shortly after, his praise of "mighty Love." His love of the maiden and his love of Christ seem to merge here and enable him to understand that even the lowest person can be raised toward perfection through the transforming power of love.
Rolland Hein said…
Yes, Bill, you are very right. Thanks much for calling our attention to these truths. I think I am so used to encountering them in GMD's writings I didn't value this expression of them as much as I should have.
Tim M said…
GMD's explanation of suffering seemed reasonable if somewhat incomplete. It could be quite helpful to a skeptic like a doctor who was trained in the enlightenment. Sounds like GMD was predisposed against some of the fuller explanations that make more complete sense such as total depravity and the Fall which would shed more light on God's mercy that we even have good things in our lives.

I really didn't get much out of the wandering Jew story or saw the link to the discussion they were having. Mostly just felt badly for someone so totally stuck in feeling like they had to earn their forgiveness that they missed the joy of Jesus having paid the penalty already.
Sarah W said…
Its funny, but the Tale of the Wandering Jew is one of my favorite. This may be in part because I listened to it on Librivox instead of reading it, and the very structure of the story is somehow musical, somehow tapestry, somehow foreign, somehow the center of my own heart. I find it very rich and beautiful, and True. God works in the mess. God works in the brokenness, the spite and selfishness and smallness of our shriveled souls. He does this with great patience, great steadfastness, great love - despite us. Ahasuerus wanders the earth seeking death and all he can find is life. It was the look Jesus gave him from the Cross that caused his "heart to die", but what did that heart that died think was good but death? And what did "the look" awaken in him, but life?:

"And if ever the memory of that look passed from me, then, straightway I began to long for death, and so longed until the memory and the power of the look came again, and with the sorrow in my soul came the patience to live. And truly, although I speak of forgetting and remembering, such motions of my spirit in me were not as those of another man; in me they are not measured by the scale of men’s lives; they are not of years, but of centuries; for the seconds of my life are ticked by a clock whose pendulum swings through an arc of motionless stars."

God's great patience! I know the power of the idea that death is the answer. I have many dear friends trapped in the idea that their particular shame and depravity make them too disgusting for salvation. GMacD's depiction of God's patience opens the eyes of my imagination, and I can hope and hope and hope for my friends. And the fact that Ahasuerus is instrumental in the increased faith of others shows God's grace to us all - He truly does work ALL things for good to those he calls; the messiness and brokenness of our lives does not hinder God's glory reflecting from His image out into the darkened world (for example, the people saw a "miracle" when they saw him hanging on the cross on their cathedral - something to open the eyes of their imagination - although from his perspective "truly it was no miracle—it was only me Ahasuerus, the wanderer taking thought concerning his crime against the crucified.")
Pat C said…
How can God not speak to us through nature since it is His creation which we are looking at and enjoying.
We are all wandering Jews until we become acquainted with Our Lord and fully accept Him as Our Savior - I love Wingfold's comments to Polwarth: "I would rather die for evermore believing as Jesus believed than live for evermore than believing as those that deny him."
This book gives one the hope of the Savior, which so many people need in this broken world. The first time I read this book I was a new believer and I did not grasp a lot of its content. As a believer of a longer time now this book tugged at my heart, and allowed me to see so much more of the Jesus of the Bible. Thank you Professor Hein for bringing it to us again.

Popular posts from this blog

Thomas Wingfold: Chapters 46 - 63

Thomas Wingfold: Chapters 29 - 45

Thomas Wingfold Chapters 11 - 28